MATERIALS ADAPTATION OF IMPORTED CEFR TEXTBOOKS: TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES

Authors

  • Nurul Farehah Mohamad Uri
  • Mohd Sallehhudin Abdul Aziz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2024.21.2.2

Abstract

Purpose - This study aims to find out ESL teachers’ perceptions of imported CEFR textbooks currently in use in the classroom. Additionally, it seeks to determine how teachers have adapted and localized the contents of these books.

Methodology - A total of 331 lower secondary school teachers participated in the survey and six were selected for face-to-face interviews. A questionnaire, utilizing a semantic differential scale ranging from one to six, was administered to collect quantitative data, while qualitative data was gathered through a semi–structured interview protocol.

Findings - The results indicate that the majority of the teachers were fully aware of the CEFR imported textbooks currently being used in schools. Interestingly, more than half of the surveyed teachers (53.8%) agreed that these books were suitable and matched CEFR levels B1 and B2 set for the secondary school level.

Significance - Findings from the interviews highlighted the necessity for teachers to adapt materials, although it also meant extra workload for them. As expected, the teachers added, modified, and simplified the contents of the textbooks. In short, materials adaptation is inevitable as long as the imported CEFR textbooks remain the main teaching materials.

References

Abdul Hakim Ali Abdul Aziz, Radzuwan Ab Rashid & Wan Zhafirah Wan Zainudin. (2018). The enactment of the Malaysian common European framework of reference (CEFR): National master trainer’s reflection. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 8(2): 409 – 417. doi:10.17509/ijal.v8i2.13307.

Chong, G & Hamidah Yamat. (2021). Teachers’ implementation of CEFR – aligned Curriculum: A preliminary study. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. 3(3):5 – 9. doi: 10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.3.2.

Koeber, A. & McMichael, L. (2008). Qualitative sampling methods: A primer for technical communicators. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 22(45): 454 – 473. doi:10.1177/1050651908320362.

Larenas, C. D., Hernandez, P. A. & Navarrete, M. O. (2015). A case study on EFL teachers’ beliefs about the teaching and learning of English in public education. Porta Linguarum, 23, 171-186.Retrieved from https://www.ugr.es/~portalin/articulos/PL_numero23/11%20%20Claudio%20Diaz.pdf

Lowe, A., Norris, A. C., Farris, A.J & Babbage. D. R. (2018). Quantifying Thematic Saturation in Qualitative Data Analysis. Field Methods Journal. 30(3): 191-207. doi: 10.1177/1525822X17749386

McDonough, J., Shaw, C & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher’s Guide (3rd edition). West Sussex. Blackwell Publishing.

McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

Mede, E & Yalcin, S. (2019). Utilizing textbook adaptation strategies: Experiences and challenges of novice and experienced EFL instructors. TESOL International Journal. 14(1): 91-104. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1244104.pdf

Mohd IqbalAhamat & Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan. (2022). Material Adaptation among Rural Primary School English Language Teachers. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 28(1): 90 - 102. doi:10.17576/3L-2022-2801-07.

Mohd Lukman, A, H & Parilah, M. S. (2020). Malaysian ESL teachers’ perception towards CEFR- aligned textbooks. International Journal of New Technology and Research. 6(10): 73 – 79. doi:10.31871/IJNTR.6.10.23

Monihuldin, M. (2018). Discussion on the use of foreign English textbooks in schools’ sparks debate. http://news.iium.edu.my/2018/01/14/discussion-on-use-offoreign-english-textbooks-in-schools-sparks-debate/

Norhana Abdullah & Chandran, S.K. (2009). Cultural Elements in a Malaysian English Language Textbook. 1 – 22: Retrieved from http://ddms.usim.edu.my/bitstream/123456789/713/1/CULTURAL%20ELEMENTS%20IN%20MALAYSIAN%20ENGLISH%20LANGUAGE%20TEXTBOOKS%20-%20MY_CASELT.pdf

Nguyen, V.H. & Hamid, M.O. (2015). Educational Policy Borrowing in a Globalized World: A Case Study of Common European Framework of Reference for Languages in a Vietnamese University. Journal of English Teaching, Practice & Critique, 14(1), 60–74. doi:10.1108/ETPC-02-2015-0014

Nurul Ain Johar & Azlina Abdul Aziz. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions on using the Pulse 2 textbook. Journal of Educational Research and Indigenous Studies. 2(1): 2-15. Retrieved from https://static.s123-cdn-static-d.com/uploads/1759562/normal_5d7c40da6128a.pdf

Rashidi, N & Safari, F. (2011). A model for EFL materials development within the Framework of Critical Pedagogy. English Language Teaching Journal. 4(2): 250-259. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n2p250

Rizaldy Hanifa. (2017). Investigating English teachers’ understanding of materials adaptation in curriculum 2013. Tenth Conference on Applied Linguistics and The Second English Language Teaching and Technology Conference in collaboration with The First International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (CONAPLIN and ICOLLITE 2017). 319-324. doi: 10.5220/0007166703190324

Roberts, F., Azlina, A.A & Mohd Effendi, E. E.M. (2020). Criteria of a Good ELT Textbook: Malaysian Teachers' Perception. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 8(12):7433 - 7442. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.082527.

Rodrigues, C. (2015). Innovative material design/adaptation ensures sustainable ELT. Journal of Education and Social Sciences. 1(2): 115- 122. Retrieved from https://www.jesoc.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Lan12_EditedFinalInnovative-Material-Final-Paper-for-Publication.doc-tbs.doc-Confirmed1.pdf

Sani, R. (2018). Building capacity to increase English proficiency. News Straits Times. February 7. https://www.nst.com.my/education/2018/02/332968/building- capacity-increase-english-proficiency

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qualitative and Quantitative Journal. 52: 1893 – 1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017 – 0574 - 8

The Star Online. (2018). Let’s have our own textbooks. 1 February. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2018/02/04/lets-have-our-own-textbooks

Timmis, I. (2016). Materials to Develop Speaking Skill. In Azarnoosh, M., Zeraatpishe, M., Faravani, A & Kargozari, H., R. (Eds.), Issues in Material Development (pp.83 – 92). Sense Publisher. doi: 10.1007/978-94-6300-432-9_8

Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials Development for Language Learning and Teaching. Language Teaching. 45(2): 143-179. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000528

Rashid, R. A. B., Rahman, S. B. A., & Yunus, K. (2018). Reforms in the policy of English language teaching in Malaysia. Policy Futures in Education 15(1): 100–112. doi: 10.1177/1478210316679069

Yuksel, I & Demiral, S. (2013). Evaluating European Language Portfolio in Turkish context: Teachers’ views on the new secondary education English teaching program. International Journal of Social Science and Education 3(4): 904–916. Retrieved from http://ijsse.com/sites/default/files/issues/2013/v3i4/papers/Paper-6.pdf [31 August 2018].

Zuraidah Mohd Don. (2019). Teacher Guide. Implementing the CEFR aligned curriculum: planning and managing learning. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Additional Files

Published

14-08-2024

How to Cite

MATERIALS ADAPTATION OF IMPORTED CEFR TEXTBOOKS: TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS AND PRACTICES. (2024). Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 23-47. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2024.21.2.2