FACTORS INFLUENCING INTENTION TO USE E-LEARNING BY AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION AGENTS IN MALAYSIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2017.0.0.9497Abstrak
The application of e-learning has extended beyond the traditional educational establishments to various other areas including agricultural sector. In agricultural sector, extension services are perhaps the key beneficiary of e-learning, being in the unique position as an intermediary between agricultural specialists and farmers. Hence the objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, management support and training; and the intention to use e-learning technology among agricultural extension agents in Malaysian agricultural sector. This quantitative study was based on Theory of Planned Behavior with management support and training as additional constructs. While there were many studies that investigated factors affecting intention to use e-learning in educational institutions, there were limited studies of the same in the context of extension agents in agriculture setting. The results showed that all of the hypotheses developed by the previous authors were supported by the study, and further revealed that management support is the most important determinant of agricultural extension agent’s intention to use e-learning, followed by attitude. Finally, the implications of this study were discussed, and further research directions were proposed.
Muat turun
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bahagian
Lesen
Disclaimer
The Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation. Articles published in the Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.